GTLBNEUTRAL

GTLB EV/EBITDA Analysis

-130.3x

Updated 299h ago·SEC filings & market data

Key Takeaway

GTLB's current EV/EBITDA of -87.9x means its enterprise value (market cap plus debt minus cash) is 87.9 times larger than its negative EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), indicating the company is unprofitable at the operating level.

Sector Performance

1th percentile

GTLB

-130.3x

Sector Median

13.6x

Sector Avg

-62.3x

Prior Period

-87.9x(Jul 2026)

↑ Improving

📊

Deep Analysis

Compared to its sector peers, where the median EV/EBITDA is 13.6x, GTLB ranks in the 2nd percentile — well below nearly all peers. The metric has increased over the last eight quarters, with a quarter-over-quarter change of +3.2% (from -90.8x to -87.9x); year-over-year change is not available. The combination of a deeply negative value and a gradual upward trend implies that while the company remains unprofitable, losses are narrowing, which reduces but does not eliminate the risk of continued cash burn. This mixed signal — extreme valuation weakness paired with improving trajectory — supports the overall NEUTRAL verdict, as the stock is neither clearly overvalued nor an obvious value trap.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the EV/EBITDA tell investors about GTLB?

A valuation multiple preferred by analysts for capital-intensive or leveraged businesses. Useful for cross-sector comparisons where earnings can be distorted by debt.

How is the EV/EBITDA calculated?

EV/EBITDA is calculated as: Enterprise Value / EBITDA.

Who are GTLB's closest peers by EV/EBITDA?

The closest peers by EV/EBITDA include: SG (-17.2x), FLNC (-22.5x), EVGO (-22.6x), LSPD (-26.9x), BRZE (-29.6x).

📚

Learn More About EV/EBITDA

EV/EBITDA Explained: The Valuation Metric Pro Investors Actually Use

Learn what EV/EBITDA is, why it beats P/E for capital-heavy companies, typical sector ranges, and key limitations every serious investor should know.

The Formula

Enterprise Value / EBITDA

Why It Matters

A valuation multiple preferred by analysts for capital-intensive or leveraged businesses. Useful for cross-sector comparisons where earnings can be distorted by debt.