TWTRCAUTIOUS

TWTR Return on Equity (ROE) Analysis

-3.0%

Higher than 0% of Communication Services sector peers

Updated 1789h ago·SEC filings & market data

Key Takeaway

TWTR (TWTR) has a Return on Equity (ROE) of -3.0% as of May 2026.

Sector Performance

0th percentile

TWTR

-3.0%

Sector Median

10.4%

Sector Avg

16.8%

📊

Deep Analysis

TWTR (TWTR) has a Return on Equity (ROE) of -3.0% as of May 2026.

This places TWTR in the 0th percentile of the Communication Services sector, which has a median Return on Equity (ROE) of 10.4% and a sector average of 16.8%. TWTR's Return on Equity (ROE) is 128.7% below the sector median, a significant divergence that warrants closer examination. In context: ROE measures how effectively management turns equity into profit. Consistently above 15% is typically considered strong. Negative equity distorts this metric.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the Return on Equity (ROE) tell investors about TWTR?

ROE measures how effectively management turns equity into profit. Consistently above 15% is typically considered strong. Negative equity distorts this metric.

How is the Return on Equity (ROE) calculated?

Return on Equity (ROE) is calculated as: Net Income / Shareholders' Equity.

How does TWTR's Return on Equity (ROE) compare to its sector?

TWTR's Return on Equity (ROE) of -3.0% compares to a Communication Services sector median of 10.4%, placing it in the 0th percentile.

Who are TWTR's closest peers by Return on Equity (ROE)?

The closest Communication Services peers by Return on Equity (ROE) include: DASH (9.9%), DIS (11.0%), PINS (8.9%), ZD (2.1%), TWLO (1.3%).

📚

Learn More About Return on Equity (ROE)

What Is Return on Equity (ROE) and Is Higher Always Better?

Return on equity ROE measures how efficiently a company generates profit from shareholder capital. Learn how to decompose ROE using DuPont analysis and why high leverage can make it dangerous—with Apple and JPMorgan examples.

The Formula

Net Income / Shareholders' Equity

Why It Matters

ROE measures how effectively management turns equity into profit. Consistently above 15% is typically considered strong. Negative equity distorts this metric.